Remember the First Amendment; eat mor chikin!



There’s something more concerning to me about the whole Chick-fil-A fiasco than simply being for or against same-sex marriage.

Chick-fil-A President and COO Dan Cathy recently created a controversial firestorm when he said on a radio talk show that, “we’re inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage. And I pray God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude that thinks we have the audacity to redefine what marriage is all about.”

His comments ignited protests nationwide from gay marriage advocates. Chicago’s and Boston’s mayors even said they would not welcome any additional Chick-fil-A restaurants in their cities. But then former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee declared Wednesday to be “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day,” and restaurants around the country had long lines waiting to get in the door.

In many places protesters showed up, some in drag, to counter those turning out to show support of the restaurant chain.

To me, and it seems to be happening more often these days, the basic principle of the Constitution’s First Amendment has all but been forgotten and even trampled upon in the rush to support and or protest Chick-fil-A. Whether I agree or disagree with Cathy’s opinion, his religion, his beliefs or what he said, it doesn’t matter.

Because the bottom line is that Cathy has the right to believe and say what he thinks in regard to same-sex marriage. The Founding Fathers believed so strongly in the free speech principle that’s why it’s first on the Amendment list ranking higher than a free press, the right to bear arms, the right of assembly, and even freedom of religion.

The First Amendment, for many, is the most difficult Amendment to support because it protects everyone. It protects people such as Cathy; it protects those who support same-sex marriages; it even protects the likes of militant brown shirt Nazi’s as well as Fred PhelpsWestboro Church clan in Topeka when family members protest soldier funerals with disgusting signs, trampling the American flag, and disgusting speech.

Allowing people such as Phelps to have an uncensored voice is the true test of a nation’s ability to guarantee free speech. You might not agree with what they say but you better fight to the death to defend their right to say it because if that group is censored who is to say your group won’t be next? And despite the color of their skin, despite their religious views, and despite their sexual preferences, hundreds of thousands of people in the past 236 years have died fighting in defense of this nation and the basic principles of its Constitution’s First Amendment.

If Cathy and Chick-Fil-A blatantly discriminated against homosexuals by firing, not hiring or not serving them, then I would understand and support protests and boycotts of the fast-food restaurant chain. Instead of the word homosexuals, substitute it with the words blacks, Hispanics, Asians, women, or even little men and my point should be easily understood.

Discrimination in any form is wrong. Just as wrong as condemning a person and his business for saying what he believes. And, as far as I know, Chick-fil-A has not discriminated against employees or customers in any way.

People need to chill. There are far too many other problems and issues facing this nation that deserve drastic attention from the people than what the president and COO of a fast-food restaurant chain thinks about same-sex marriage.

And until Cathy or Chick-fil-A have been proven guilty of any discrimination charges, well, I’ll continue to eat there now-and-then because I like the sandwiches, I like the lemonade, and they provide good customer service no matter who is behind the counter.

Bon appetit!

2 Responses

  1. Well said…and one part of the special Liberty provided to me by so many who have even given of their lives to help guarantee this freedom to speak amongst my peers without fear of hanging that I cherish dearly.

  2. Comments from ViewFromTheMidwest’s facebook page:

    For me more at issue is the fact that groups that he has founded and supports financially have the potential to stop, or limit the rights of people who are homosexual, and deserve the same rights that an opposite sex “married” couple. I cou
    ldn’t care less about if he likes gay marriage or not. I think that it is good that he is standing up for what he feels is right. I am, however, going to use my dollar to prevent him from lending support to groups that spread false messages about same sex marriage. Just my personal view.

    Down here I have heard more people (all people ) say it has nothing to do with the marriage thing…the turn out down here was about free speech …

    Good column, Chuck. I’ve seen no evidence that company discriminates. The argument has been they donate to “hate groups”, as some have defined them.

    It’s true, but it’s also my right (and the LGBT community’s) to say shame on them for spreading intolerance. It goes both ways.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: